AMD Ryzen desktop CPU benchmark shows it can run with the Intel $1,000 CPU pack
AMD is aiming to bring high-priced performance to processors with a smaller cost due to the huge gains stemming from its Zen processor architecture in its new Ryzen CPUs. We recently saw a leaked roadmap of what AMD intends to sell regarding its Ryzen processor family next month, and now we have a leaked benchmark of the high-end R7 1700X chip.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="As we saw last week, the R7 1700X processor will be an eight-core 16-thread chip that will compete with Intel’s Core i7-7700K CPU. The processor’s benchmark went live on Passmark on Tuesday, which consisted of an entry-level MSI A320 AM4 motherboard (which can’t be used to overclock), and 16GB of DDR4 memory clocked at 2,400MHz. The chip was shown to have a base clock speed of 3.4GHz and a turbo clock speed of 3.8GHz.” data-reactid=”24″>As we saw last week, the R7 1700X processor will be an eight-core 16-thread chip that will compete with Intel’s Core i7-7700K CPU. The processor’s benchmark went live on Passmark on Tuesday, which consisted of an entry-level MSI A320 AM4 motherboard (which can’t be used to overclock), and 16GB of DDR4 memory clocked at 2,400MHz. The chip was shown to have a base clock speed of 3.4GHz and a turbo clock speed of 3.8GHz.
The benchmark compared AMD’s unannounced processor against the following CPUs:
- Intel Core i7-6900K @ 3.2GHz ($1,089)
- Intel Core i7-5960X @ 3.0GHz ($1,000)
- Intel Core i7-6800K @ 3.4GHz ($434)
- Intel core i7-7700K @ 4.2GHz ($339)
- AMD FX-8350 ($150)
Out of eight tests, the Ryzen chip outperformed all the others in five: Integer Math, Floating Point Math, Sorting, Encryption, and Extended Instructions (SSE). It fell into fourth place in the Prime Numbers test, fourth place in the Physics test, and second place in the Compression test. The big takeaway here is that the Ryzen CPU outperformed Intel’s two $1,000 processors in those five tests while outperforming the Core i7-5960X processor in the Compression test … at nearly half the cost.
<p class="canvas-atom canvas-text Mb(1.0em) Mb(0)–sm Mt(0.8em)–sm" type="text" content="More: AMD optimizes ‘For Honor’ in latest Radeon Software Crimson ReLive update” data-reactid=”33″>More: AMD optimizes ‘For Honor’ in latest Radeon Software Crimson ReLive update
AMD’s R7 1700X processor will reportedly be priced at a mere $381.72. Even more, the R7 1800X will supposedly cost $490.29 and the R7 1700 will cost $316.59. This should not only bode well for AMD in the mainstream desktop sector, but the enterprise and server markets too due to Ryzen’s low cost, low power consumption, and its performance in the Integer Math and Encryption tests.
Ultimately, the AMD R7 1700X chip scored a CPU Mark of 15,084. Here’s the chip compared to the others:
|Processor||CPU Mark Score|
|Intel Core i7-6900K||16,475|
|Intel Core i7-5960X||15,615|
|AMD R7 1700X||15,084|
|Intel Core i7-6800K||13,356|
|Intel core i7-7700K||11,654|
As the scores show, AMD’s upcoming $382 processor isn’t too far behind Intel’s two $1,000 chips. Of course, this likely won’t be AMD’s fastest Ryzen chip on the market, as that is expected to be the R7 1800X model for a heftier $490. Still, if the R7 1800X matches the Core i7-6900K’s performance, that’s half the cost for mainstream desktop customers.
Finally, here are the results of Passmark’s single-threaded performance test:
|Processor||CPU Single Threaded|
|Intel Core i7-7700K||2,343|
|Intel core i7-6900K||2,095|
|AMD R7 1700X||2,046|
|Intel Core i7-6800K||1,975|
|Intel Core i7-5960X||1,964|
AMD is expected to launch four eight-core Ryzen processors next month under the R7 label ranging in cost between $319 and $500. There will be three six-core R5 units, three four-core R5 units, and three four-core R3 units as well.
- CPU guru David Kanter digs into AMD’s Zen and Ryzen technology
- Pre-order listing shows AMD’s Ryzen desktop CPUs may roll out this month
- AMD is sneaking in another ‘Zen’ demo ahead of Intel’s desktop CPU launch
Let’s block ads! (Why?)